Elon Musk now has enough information to steal your identity

[hammerhead]

Which cable TV news station had to pay $millions in fines?

[JBB2]

Which cable TV news station had to pay $millions in fines?

Let’s see, nbc

NBC Settles $30M Defamation Lawsuit After Fake News About Doctor At ICE Facilities

Maybe it was abc

ABC settles with Trump for $15 million. Now, he wants to sue other news outlets

How about cbs

CBS is currently involved in a lawsuit filed by Donald Trump, who claims the network edited a "60 Minutes" interview with Kamala Harris in a deceptive manner, resulting in damages of $20 billion. A federal judge has allowed the lawsuit to proceed, despite CBS's attempts to dismiss it.

[JBB2]

Jack said:

You reject the AP and then quote breitbart? Just because a news outlet says what you want to hear doesn't make it accurate.

The sources I’m using are not bought and paid for by usaid and the deep state propaganda initiative. The sources you quote are.

Jack said:

Trump revoked the AP's access to limited space White House events for using the globally accepted name for the Gulf of Mexico.

WRONG!!!

IMG_0208-compressed.jpeg (36.76 KiB) Viewed 32895 times

Just to clarify your attempt to downplay the seriousness of the ap getting “delisted”:

From the White House, the complete statement:

“The Associated Press continues to ignore the lawful geographic name change of the Gulf of America. This decision is not just devise, but it also exposes the Associated Press’ commitment to misinformation. While their right to irresponsible and dishonest reporting is protected by the First Amendment, it does not ensure their privilege of unfettered access to limited spaces, like the Oval Office and Air Force One,” Budowich wrote

[User1]

Another day....more winning!
MAGA!

[Jack]

Jack said:

You reject the AP and then quote breitbart? Just because a news outlet says what you want to hear doesn't make it accurate.

The sources I’m using are not bought and paid for by usaid and the deep state propaganda initiative. The sources you quote are.

Jack said:

Trump revoked the AP's access to limited space White House events for using the globally accepted name for the Gulf of Mexico.

WRONG!!!

IMG_0208-compressed.jpeg


Just to clarify your attempt to downplay the seriousness of the ap getting “delisted”:

From the White House, the complete statement:

“The Associated Press continues to ignore the lawful geographic name change of the Gulf of America. This decision is not just devise, but it also exposes the Associated Press’ commitment to misinformation. While their right to irresponsible and dishonest reporting is protected by the First Amendment, it does not ensure their privilege of unfettered access to limited spaces, like the Oval Office and Air Force One,” Budowich wrote

You are gullible but at least you are consistent. Do you ever question the trump administration?

The Associated Press was among the media outlets said to receive USAID funding. Although the news wire has been paid $37.5 million by other government agencies since 2008, none of that came from USAID, according to a federal government website that tracks its spending. AP spokeswoman Lauren Easton said that “the U.S. government has long been an AP customer — through both Democratic and Republican administrations. It licenses AP’s nonpartisan journalism, just like thousands of news outlets and customers around the world. It’s quite common for governments to have contracts with news organizations for their content.”

https://www.usaspending.gov/search/?has ... 409f525ce1

[JBB2]

What in the world is your point Jack? Some of the money they may be spending is fine? We already know that. What needs to be established is what spending isn’t fine. Got it yet?

Your objections to change aside: This government needs to be audited and cleaned up.

Any objection to investigating which subscriptions might be legitimate or are your proclimations all that’s necessary to assure the taxpayer all is fine? What about the other trillion, all clear on that too? :

are you a magazine salesman? What is your objection to a leaner, fiscally responsible nation? We don’t have that now. We are all facing bankruptcy. Maybe Thats why the DOGE approval level is through the roof?!

[Jack]

What in the world is your point Jack? Some of the money they may be spending is fine? We already know that. What needs to be established is what spending isn’t fine. Got it yet?

Your objections to change aside: This government needs to be audited and cleaned up.

Any objection to investigating which subscriptions might be legitimate or are your proclimations all that’s necessary to assure the taxpayer all is fine? What about the other trillion, all clear on that too? :

are you a magazine salesman? What is your objection to a leaner, fiscally responsible nation? We don’t have that now. We are all facing bankruptcy. Maybe Thats why the DOGE approval level is through the roof?!

Rewind to my first reply in this topic - I was pointing out the inaccurate information in the SSA information you posted. Since then, I have just been responding to your follow-on posts.

I'm not against government cost cutting, improving its efficiency, or eliminating fraud. Please point out to me where I have said that I am. I'm all for a full audit of government agencies but that is not what is happening. Musk is just hacking and slashing to generate headlines. You appear to be so worried about the "deep state" that you believe everything he says and won't do any fact checking before posting.

[JBB2]

Of course Jack. You claimed Everything is just fine at the social security administration you didn’t expect that absurdity to go unchallenged did you? In fact I thought you might be a troll.

Sure sounded then, as it does now, you are unwilling to wait for results. Not good to rush to judgement.

Naturally Chainsaw Musk, like all reformers, is just “hacking and slashing”. Remember how he destroyed twitter. Let’s hope for similar results with DOGE.

[Jack]

Of course Jack. You claimed Everything is just fine at the social security administration you didn’t expect that absurdity to go unchallenged did you? In fact I thought you might be a troll.

Sure sounded then, as it does now, you are unwilling to wait for results. Not good to rush to judgement.

Naturally Chainsaw Musk, like all reformers, is just “hacking and slashing”. Remember how he destroyed twitter. Let’s hope for similar results with DOGE.

You really lack reading comprehension skills. I did not say everything was alright at the SSA. I said the posted numbers and interpretation of those numbers was wrong. If that is absurd, prove it. How much money was saved by not paying all of those dead people? If they had stopped paying millions of people, it would save billions every month. They wouldn't pass up an opportunity to publicize that.

Elon paid $44B for twitter. Its now worth about $10B.

[BisonOline]

What in the world is your point Jack? Some of the money they may be spending is fine? We already know that. What needs to be established is what spending isn’t fine. Got it yet?

Your objections to change aside: This government needs to be audited and cleaned up.

Any objection to investigating which subscriptions might be legitimate or are your proclimations all that’s necessary to assure the taxpayer all is fine? What about the other trillion, all clear on that too? :

are you a magazine salesman? What is your objection to a leaner, fiscally responsible nation? We don’t have that now. We are all facing bankruptcy. Maybe Thats why the DOGE approval level is through the roof?!

Rewind to my first reply in this topic - I was pointing out the inaccurate information in the SSA information you posted. Since then, I have just been responding to your follow-on posts.

I'm not against government cost cutting, improving its efficiency, or eliminating fraud. Please point out to me where I have said that I am. I'm all for a full audit of government agencies but that is not what is happening. Musk is just hacking and slashing to generate headlines. You appear to be so worried about the "deep state" that you believe everything he says and won't do any fact checking before posting.

Hes doing that because it needs to be done. If you go the negotiation route then NOTHING will get done. Slash it now fine tune later. There is a lot of corruption being exposed. I find it humorous that people deflect the results away because of the method. Hes not making headlines in as much as the findings. Hes already famous , claiming hes doing this for headlines is disingenuous.