Bison Forum

to enrich in power and money those politicians and their operatives to engage useful idiots with a narrative dumped on the unsuspecting public

Everybody gets paid off. Always have. It’s all a lie

EXAMPLE:

The test case for looting the federal treasury in broad daylight was Solyndra, under Obama’s “green energy” initiatives:

• Solyndra’s chief investor, George Kaiser, was also a bundler for Obama’s 2008 campaign, gathering over $50,000 in campaign contributions. Kaiser, together with Solyndra executives and board members, donated $87,050 to Obama’s campaign.

• As part of the economic stimulus, Obama’s Department of Energy (DOE) fast-tracked a loan of $535 million (at the lowest interest rate granted by the DOE program) to Solyndra in 2009 to create green jobs. …

About a year later … Solyndra laid off nearly all of its 1,100 workers and declared bankruptcy.

… DOE allowed Kaiser and other investors to recover their investments first, before DOE attempted to recover the $535 million in taxpayers’ money. What a sweetheart deal. America’s taxpayers have been left holding the bag.

Solyndra board members voted themselves “golden parachutes”: multi-million-dollar severance packages. This was repeated by Nevada Geothermal ($145 million) and Beacon Power ($43 million). For Illinois voters, the Solyndra pattern was all too familiar. Left-wingers contribute to Democrats’ campaigns; after the election, they’re rewarded with taxpayers’ millions.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/20 ... oners.html

WINNING

USDA REMOVES Climate Change Propaganda From Websites Amid Federal Spending Review
by Lance D. Johnson | Feb 4, 2025 | Headline News

https://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/ ... ing-review

the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has instructed its employees to scrub references to climate change from agency websites.

Key points:

• USDA employees were ordered to delete or archive web pages discussing climate change and document all related content for review.

• The directive could impact dozens of programs, including climate-smart agriculture initiatives and wildfire management resources.

• The move coincides with a federal spending review that threatens funding for clean energy and conservation programs.

• Critics, often left-leaning activists and green energy millionaires, argue the decision undermines efforts to address climate-related challenges facing farmers, such as extreme weather and wildfires.

• These critics cannot manage natural disasters in their own communities, as evidenced by the out-of-control fires in Los Angeles.

• Climate change pushers cannot be taken seriously to cure the world of natural disasters if they cannot manage a natural disaster in their own cities.